Skip to main content

Android’s Find My Device network seems to actually work now – have you been using it?

The Find My Device network was full of promise, but Android’s alternative to the tech behind Apple’s AirTag launched to a rough start in 2024. Over time, though, it seems to finally be getting better. Are you actually using it?


This issue of 9to5Google Weekender is a part of 9to5Google’s rebooted newsletter that highlights the biggest Google stories with added commentary and other tidbits. Sign up here to get it delivered to your inbox early!


After a year’s delay, to Apple’s benefit, Google finally flipped the switch on the Find My Device network for Android in mid-2024. The staged rollout took months, and left trackers from Pebblebee and Chipolo practically worthless. Compared to the likes of the AirTag and even Samsung’s Galaxy-only network, Google’s just wasn’t as good as we found in our tests, and as others showed just the same.

The main struggle with the Find My Device network was seemingly Google’s privacy-forward decision to default the network to a “high-traffic” status that prevented a lot of Android phones from contributing to the network in more rural areas. Beyond that, Google also designed the network to require two devices to locate the same tracker. The two combined put the network at a steep disadvantage in the United States, a market dominated by the iPhone, and didn’t really help the situation internationally.

Google did commit to improving things, though.

One way that seems to be happening is the wider use of a message in the Find My Device app that tells users to enable tracking in all areas, not just in high-traffic locations. This prompt has been around for a while, but it seems to be appearing more consistently in recent months on devices that don’t have “low-traffic” tracking enabled.

Anecdotally, the network also just seems to be working better lately than it has in the past. Trackers connect faster – perhaps thanks to firmware and app updates – and seem to be located faster. In my travel to Las Vegas for CES 2025 this week, the Moto Tag in my checked suitcase was getting location updates just as quickly, if not faster than the AirTag next to it. That was far from true even a few months ago, and I’m impressed!

I’m sure there were plenty of behind-the-scenes improvements involved here, though I suspect most of this is simply from mass adoption and the slow process of getting people to turn on “low-traffic” support.

What do you think? Have you noticed better performance from Find My Device trackers? Have you been using them at all? I wouldn’t blame anyone for throwing in the towel on these trackers – I nearly did too – but I’m glad that, months later, things finally seem to be getting a whole lot better.


This Week’s Top Stories

CES 2025 is on the horizon

While we don’t expect to hear as much from Google this year, 2025 is kicking off as per usual with CES, one of the year’s largest tech events. We’re on the ground for the event, so expect a ton of coverage over the coming days from the show.

One announcement ahead of the show that’s already enticing is Hisense’s new L9Q short-throw projector which promises incredible 5,000 nit brightness.

LineageOS debuts based on Android 15

The latest version of LineageOS dropped this week, bringing Android 15 as well as support for the Pixel 9 series.

More Top Stories


From the rest of 9to5

Top comment by Kieron Quinn

Liked by 15 people

I've been using both a Moto Tag (Google Find my Device) and a Galaxy SmartTag 2 (Samsung's network) over the Christmas period to test viability of both networks.

Google's network has certainly improved to the point of being usable in higher traffic areas, but it still suffers in the more "remote" areas (this can include cities where there aren't as many people nearby). I think what's actually happened to improve Google's network is there's sufficient people with the default setting enabled that when the Tag is in a busier area, such as an airport, there are enough Android devices nearby to get location pings.

I did some testing taking both Tags around a Christmas Market back in December (will publish the results soon, along with an app that allows using Samsung's Tags on other Android devices), including taking public transport into a city centre. The Moto Tag got more pings, but the Samsung one got what I'd consider more meaningful updates - there were zero pings from Google's network on the tram for example, but the Galaxy Tag got multiple. I've also noticed Google's network is prone to locations which are not very accurate, which seems to be as a result of the privacy-protecting location averaging that's going on.

View all comments

9to5Mac: iPhone 17 Air: Design, cameras, pricing, and more

9to5Toys: Samsung debuts ‘first monitor to integrate on-device AI’ with all-new OLED Smart Monitor M9

Electrek: Rivian (RIVN) stock surges after delivering more EVs than expected in Q4 2024

Follow Ben: Twitter/XThreads, Bluesky, and Instagram

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

You’re reading 9to5Google — experts who break news about Google and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Google on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

Manage push notifications

notification icon
We would like to show you notifications for the latest news and updates.
notification icon
You are subscribed to notifications
notification icon
We would like to show you notifications for the latest news and updates.
notification icon
You are subscribed to notifications