Employees take their lunch break in the sun at Google headquarters in Mountain View, California March 3, 2008. REUTERS/Erin Siegal (UNITED STATES) - RTR1XUQ7
1

Employees take their lunch break in the sun at Google headquarters in Mountain View, California March 3, 2008. REUTERS/Erin Siegal (UNITED STATES) - RTR1XUQ7

With Google potentially facing a fine of up to $6.6B after the European Commission charged the company of abusing its dominant position in search, its lawyers have now filed a 130-page rebuttal. In it, the company attempts to use a legal technicality to argue that it cannot be fined for favouring its own products in search results … 

Reuters reports that Google is arguing that regulators were only entitled to act in cases where there is a trading relationship between a company and its customers. As Google’s search service is free, its users cannot, it suggests, be considered customers.

The statement of objections fails to take proper account of the fact that search is provided for free. A finding of abuse of dominance requires a ‘trading relationship’ as confirmed by consistent case law. No trading relationship exists between Google and its users.

European Commission spokesman Ricardo Cardoso declined to comment to Reuters.

Google’s multiple legal battles in Europe look set to continue to run for some time yet …

Photo: Reuters/Erin Siegal

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.


Check out 9to5Google on YouTube for more news:

You’re reading 9to5Google — experts who break news about Google and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Google on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

About the Author

Ben Lovejoy's favorite gear