google play store

Earlier this year Google signed a temporary deal with Match Group, the company that owns the popular dating app Tinder, which would allow the group’s apps to use third-party billing during a lawsuit. Now, Google has issued a counterclaim against Match, saying that the group wants to use the Play Store and its services “all for free.”

Match Group operates a slew of popular dating apps including Tinder, Hinge, OkCupid, and others. The group claims that Google is using anticompetitive practices in the Play Store, specifically targeting billing policies that require app makers to use Google’s billing tools and pay the company up to 30% of revenue generated on Android.

As mentioned, Google and Match signed a temporary deal earlier this year that would see up to $40 million go into an escrow account during the lawsuit until a final agreement is reached.

TechCrunch reports that Google has now filed a counterclaim in the lawsuit, arguing that Match is trying to mislead the court by saying that Google only provides payment processing services. Google argues that it provides further tools and distribution through the Play Store, and that Match is seeking to use it “all for free.”

Google says:

While Match Group claims that Google Play only provides payment processing, that simply isn’t true. Google Play provides tools and a global distribution platform that has allowed Match Group to thrive and build a successful network of users that is critical for its dating apps. Match Group now seeks to access Google Play’s global distribution platform and users and leverage Google’s substantial investments in the platform, all for free.

Google’s response expands pointing to the new 15% fee, as well as that Android allows apps to be sideloaded. The company also points out a statement from a Match VP who said that the company’s main problem with using Play Store billing is not the free, but “the ease with which users can cancel their subscriptions.” TechCrunch points out a previous lawsuit where the US FTC sued Match for fraud in part because of the company’s intentionally difficult process for canceling a subscription. Most of the claims in that suit were later dismissed. Google also referenced the FTC’s claims and mentioned that Match executives had previously acknowledged that the cancellation process is “hard to find, tedious, and confusing.”

More on Play Store:

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.

Check out 9to5Google on YouTube for more news:

You’re reading 9to5Google — experts who break news about Google and its surrounding ecosystem, day after day. Be sure to check out our homepage for all the latest news, and follow 9to5Google on Twitter, Facebook, and LinkedIn to stay in the loop. Don’t know where to start? Check out our exclusive stories, reviews, how-tos, and subscribe to our YouTube channel

About the Author

Ben Schoon

Ben is a writer and video producer for 9to5Google.

Find him on Twitter @NexusBen. Send tips to or encrypted to