According to a report from Bloomberg, Google is planning to soon separate its photo services from Google+ that allow users to backup, store, manage and edit photos. The move is apparently an attempt to “attract more users” to its photo services by offering them without the requirement of a Google+ profile. 

Google is reportedly considering rebranding the service in the process, but will also continue to offer the photo services to Google+ users. The move would be similar to what Google has done with its Hangouts messaging and video chat service, allowing users to access the photo features independent of Google+:

The move would enable the photo service to stand more independently and be accessible for consumers who aren’t part of Google+, potentially spurring more growth, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the plans aren’t public. The service, called Google+ Photos, would still work with the social network’s users and may be rebranded as part of the move, one of the people said.

As noted in the report, Google just this week made a change to Hangouts for business customers that allows them to use its Hangouts video conferencing features without a Google+ account.

Google didn’t comment directly on the claims in the report but it did give Bloomberg the following statement: “Over here in our darkroom, we’re always developing new ways for people to snap, share and say cheese.”

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

4 Responses to “Google reportedly planning standalone photo service without Google+ requirement”

  1. Sunil Kilaru says:

    Photographs incorporate pictures of loved ones, as well as timestamps and GPS areas. This is profitable individual information. Publicists would pay considerable aggregates for this information.

  2. standardpull says:

    Google would be very foolish not to link photo services with Google+ – this is more evidence that Google is dropping the ball.

    Photos not only include images of friends and family, but timestamps and GPS locations. This is valuable personal data. Advertisers would pay substantial sums for this data.

    If Google fails to associate this data with an individual, they will be basically throwing money away.

  3. I really enjoyed this article. if you would like ideas on Photo Editing in general, check out this tutorial that I
    just completed. It is very informative and teaches some pretty cool photo editing techniques. Here is the website

  4. A standalone photo service? They should give it a name that makes one think of “pictures”, like, oh, I dunno, how about “Picasa”? Just spitballing here…